26 Comments
User's avatar
Andrea's avatar

Our medical system is not about health and well-being. It was created by psychopaths who want to hurt people. This made me so sad. Poor innocent baby Berit. I hope his soul is someplace far better than this fallen world.

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

So very true

Expand full comment
Larry Johnson's avatar

SADS or SIDS are both murder.

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

Yes indeed

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

None of the childhood vaccines has ever been placebo tested. A true placebo has NO effects and does not contain heavy metals like aluminum or mercury. Pregnant women are warned not to eat tuna due to mercury content which can harm fetuses and harm breast-feeding babies by pediatricians and other public health sources, but the ignorant MDs lie to parents when they know or SHOULD KNOW that much more mercury and or aluminum is contained in the vaccines they give to these babies.

The childhood vaccines have all been tested against other previously approved vaccines which were not placebo tested. The manufacturers obviously know they are not following the rigorous scientific design, testing, data-collection, and analysis, but they lie about the "safety and efficacy" or else they wouldn't create propaganda marketing to cover this up.

The COVID "vaccine" which is not a vaccine but a gene therapy was the only "vaccine" that was placebo tested. The manufacturers already knew in advance they were going to be criticized as unscientific if they didn't reintroduce the previously missing placebo that JFK Jr. and others made a lot of noise in the 2010s. After a short few weeks of testing COVID19 "vaccine" to create data to give the FDA, the manufacturers deliberately destroyed the placebo groups, so that the harms of the Fake COVID-19 "vaccines" could not be determined by continuing comparisons between placebo group members and the COVID19 jabbed group members.

As a result, the only control group remains those within the population who never had one single "COVID" vaccine or booster. That number is estimated to be about 35% of the US population, but nobody actually knows, due to the sloppy unscientific data collections and the unscientific changing of definitions while the data collections were ongoing and continue to be ongoing.

All of the childhood scheduled vaccines and the COVID-19 "vaccines" were not properly tested for "safety and efficacy." All claims of "safety and efficacy" are lies. All are huge gambles with the safety of the future lifespan of all takers, as the scientific data is clearly missing in action.

Instead, Dr. David Martin states that we should never go along with the deceitful game that the COVID-19 jabs are "vaccines." They are mRNA gene therapy that targets each cell with the synthetic fragment spike protein that turns human cells into a scheduled bioweapon that kills the human so injected. Dr. Martin points to patent language that prove these jabs are bioweapons. Dr. Martin identifies it as a criminal felony to inject any human with a bioweapon.

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

Covid vaccine was not tested against a saline placebo either

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

I keep reading it was the first time it was a placebo. What exactly was that placebo if it was not neutral?

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

Vaccines are never tested against a true placebo. Rather, they use something that they call "placebo" but what it is actually is ALL of the ingredients in a vaccine EXCEPT the antigen. THAT is their "placebo."

Crimes against humanity.

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

Thank you. That hides the harm caused by the other ingredients, such as thimersol or aluminum or 50 other harmful ingredients. That's not a true placebo. It certainly is not neutral, as it rigs the test by hiding the effects of all those ingredients EXCEPT the antigen. The only ingredient being tested is the antigen, but all these other harmful ingredients are not being tested. They are wrongfully assumed to not have their own impacts. That's a violation of the rigorous scientific design and testing. This should be exposed in peer review, but where actually is all this peer review criticism and why don't we hear or read about it?

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Yes, someone put it so very well but I can never remember the quote.

It was something like, “It’s like testing whether vodka has adverse effects on a two year old. The placebo is whiskey. Since the child who got vodka is no worse off than the child who got whiskey, they can say vodka isn’t dangerous for two years olds”. (It was much more eloquent than that!)

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

It wasn’t. I can’t remember exactly but I remember reading it was tested against another vaccine. Del Bigtree mentioned it

Expand full comment
Bobby R's avatar

Murder.

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

100%

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

devestating but thanks for saying, in the name of saving...some...

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

yes

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

This happened to me too! Right before they gave my child his 2 month vaccines I wondered ‘what if those parents that claim vaccines cause autism are right? This seems like an awful lot for a 10# baby.’ Of course the doctor fluffed off my concerns as well.

Expand full comment
Jojo's avatar

Now wait a few months until the stories about kids under 5 dying because of the COVID shots.

Expand full comment
Barbara Repko's avatar

I would’ve sued, no matter what they said. But I never would’ve allowed 8 vaccines at once. Don’t be intimidated! Doctors get big bonuses tens of thousands of dollars) for every child they vaccinate.

Expand full comment
Susan Stephens's avatar

Multiple vaccines are combined in one shot - I’ve read as many as 5. So it can appear that ONLY 2 shots given but in fact many many vaccines all at once😡

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

Correct. DTaP contains Diptheria Tetanus and acellular Pertusis, 3 in 1

Expand full comment
Angie Runyan's avatar

My heart breaks for Anne and every parent who has had to suffer through such a loss. More parents need to have more info before they are faced with such a tragedy. You've created an excellent resource, Larry. I will be sharing it!

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

Thank you Angie!

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

The one question that never gets answered is what is the ethical way to test for vaccine safety on an infant? What would that safety research look like? Where would you find enough mothers of newborns to agree to allow that safety research be done on their babies?

Expand full comment
Larry Cook's avatar

There is no ethical way.

Expand full comment
Ann Bradley's avatar

These sudden deaths of our little ones have been dismissed for years and I am absolutely convinced there has been a cover up and those deaths are due to vaccination which run into high numbers by the time a child is five years old. It is not natural and particularly in The West where we have good nutrition and health care, hence strong immune systems. also none of these diseases are prelavent these days in The West. I am no longer convinced about these mass vaccination programmes. Doctors are simply instructed to do it without question, so wrong. As a child born in the war the only vaccine I received was the compulsory smallpox, I remain active and healthy at 80+ . As a child I was very prone to cold sores which I believe are related to the same virus as the smallpox virus! Why out any virus into a healthy newborn or anyone else for that matter who is in good health. I rest my case.

Expand full comment
Boomer Lady's avatar

There isn't ever a reason to be vaccinated...not even to attend school. There are online learning that doesn't require huge amounts of time by parents. Ron Paul curriculum comes to mind.

SIDS isn't a cause of death. If the doctor and staff don't know, pay for a private autopsy that specifically investigates vaccine related deaths. It is a different autopsy from the usual one.

Expand full comment